In Ethiopia, as in many diverse societies across the world, there are both isolated and common narratives that shape the collective understanding of history, identity, and socio-political dynamics. The phenomenon is currently far more pronounced than ever in this country.
Political and ideological eclecticism that has developed in the battle of ideas between those who advocated for class struggle and those who demanded for “national liberation” by the barrel of the gun had precipitated into a chaotic half a century which is still lingering around haunting the nation. However, both groups failed to come to success because their ideological basis was imported from abroad. Although Ethiopia had not lacked philosophers, sociologists and economists, those who were infatuated with these imported ideologies never came closer to their dreams. Today, the story is the same in different historical post dé-tente epoch.
As both isolated and common narratives have their roots in the political jigsaw puzzle that was fomenting in Ethiopia, the writer of this article wishes to briefly dwell upon both concepts. This specific article focuses on Isolated Narratives to be followed by Common Narratives on subsequent edition.
Isolated narratives are cherished in different ethnic groups and regions which have their own unique narratives that highlight their history, cultural heritage, and experiences. These narratives often reflect specific grievances, aspirations, and perceptions of marginalization or empowerment within the broader Ethiopian context.
On the other hand, various political ideologies and movements may promote their own narratives to mobilize support and challenge the existing power structures. These narratives can vary widely, from nationalist narratives emphasizing Ethiopia’s unity and sovereignty to separatist narratives advocating for greater autonomy or independence for certain regions or ethnic groups.
Different interpretations of historical events, particularly those related to colonialism, imperialism, and state-building, can lead to divergent narratives about Ethiopia’s past and its implications for the present. These interpretations may be influenced by factors such as ideology, identity politics, and access to historical records and resources.
Emotionally charged comments, hate oriented misinformation and calls for insurrections against elected legal regimes and discrediting every development program that is conducted by the government constitute some of the major contents of isolated narratives. Misuse and abuse of the press law, wrong interpretation of the rule of law and human rights are also some of the elements of isolated narratives.
Use of the social media in the most absurd manner to gain political acceptance and recognition is also part of isolated narratives.
Isolated narratives in Ethiopia, like in any diverse society, can pose several dangers:
Isolated narratives in Ethiopia often emphasize the grievances, aspirations, and identities of specific ethnic or regional groups at the expense of broader national unity. This can fuel divisions, mistrust, and conflicts between different communities, undermining social cohesion and collective solidarity. This hass been clearly proved in Ethiopia during the two years of devastating war in the northern part of the country which resulted in massive human and material loss.
When isolated narratives are perceived as exclusive or competing with each other, they can exacerbate ethnic tensions, political polarization, and inter-group conflicts. This polarization can lead to violence, instability, and the breakdown of social order, as witnessed in episodes of ethnic violence and communal clashes in Ethiopia.
Isolated narratives may marginalize or exclude certain voices, perspectives, or identities within Ethiopian society, perpetuating inequalities, discrimination, and social injustices. This can reinforce patterns of marginalization, discrimination, and structural violence against vulnerable or marginalized groups.
Overemphasis on isolated narratives may erode the sense of national identity, shared values, and collective belonging among Ethiopians. This can weaken the bonds of citizenship, patriotism, and national solidarity, hindering efforts to forge a common vision for the future and address common challenges facing the nation.
Isolated narratives can create barriers to meaningful dialogue, reconciliation, and conflict resolution, as they prioritize narrow interests and perspectives over broader national interests and common goals. This can perpetuate cycles of resentment, grievances, and historical animosities, hindering efforts to build trust and reconciliation among different communities.
Isolated narratives may be exploited or manipulated by political actors, interest groups, or external forces to advance their own agendas, consolidate power, or sow discord within Ethiopian society. This manipulation can deepen divisions, exacerbate conflicts, and undermine democratic governance and stability.
Editor’s Note: The views entertained in this article do not necessarily reflect the stance of The Ethiopian Herald
BY SOLOMON DIBABA
THE ETHIOPIAN HERALD FRIDAY 10 MAY 2024
