The construction industry is a fundamental driver of economic growth, providing infrastructure that supports transportation, housing, energy, and industry. The success of this sector depends on the competency of contractors, the efficiency of project execution, and the ability to translate design into practical construction methods.
A well-functioning construction company contributes to national development by delivering high-quality, cost-effective, and timely infrastructure projects. However, ensuring this success requires a strong regulatory framework, particularly in competency certification, constructability, planning, and methodology development.
Competency certification plays a crucial role in maintaining industry standards by ensuring that contractors and their technical managers meet the required level of expertise. Governments issue competency certificates based on technical qualifications, financial capacity, and past project performance. These certifications serve as a safeguard, preventing unqualified individuals or companies from undertaking complex construction activities that could compromise safety, quality, and efficiency. A competent technical manager is expected to have the knowledge and leadership skills necessary to oversee construction processes, manage risks, and ensure compliance with contractual and regulatory requirements.
Constructability is another key determinant of success in the construction industry. It refers to the ability to translate design concepts into practical, cost-effective construction solutions. A contractor’s expertise in constructability allows for the identification of design inefficiencies, optimization of materials and resources, and selection of the best construction methodologies. Efficient constructability minimizes delays, reduces waste, and improves overall project performance. A strong technical team, led by a qualified and competent technical manager, is essential for achieving these goals.
Efficiency in planning and methodology development further distinguishes successful construction companies. Effective planning involves the strategic allocation of resources, scheduling of activities, risk assessment, and cost control measures. Methodology development, on the other hand, focuses on the selection of construction techniques, integration of new technologies, and innovation in project execution. A construction company that excels in these areas can deliver projects on time and within budget, thereby contributing to national economic growth and infrastructure development.
However, applying reverse thinking to this scenario highlights the risks of a weak regulatory system or poor enforcement of competency certification. If a contractor’s approved technical manager lacks expertise or if their role is overtaken by an inexperienced individual—such as a company owner with no engineering, legal, or economic understanding—the consequences can be severe. In such cases, key project decisions may be driven by financial motives rather than technical feasibility, leading to inefficiencies, increased costs, and potential project failures. An inexperienced decision-maker may overlook critical aspects such as quality control, safety standards, and compliance with legal requirements, ultimately compromising the integrity of the construction industry.
The effects of a weak technical leadership structure extend beyond individual projects to the broader economy. Poorly executed infrastructure projects lead to increased maintenance costs, frequent repairs, and, in extreme cases, structural failures. Delays in project completion due to mismanagement can hinder economic development, disrupt public services, and discourage investment in the construction sector. Moreover, a lack of expertise at the managerial level can result in disputes, contract breaches, and legal challenges, further straining project timelines and resources.
To prevent these risks, governments and regulatory bodies must ensure strict enforcement of competency certification and oversight of technical management roles. Contractors should be required to demonstrate their capacity not only through certification but also through periodic evaluations of their performance. The role of a technical manager should be protected by regulations that prevent interference from unqualified individuals. Training programs, continuous professional development, and performance monitoring should be integrated into the certification process to maintain high industry standards.
In conclusion, competency certification, constructability, and efficiency in planning and methodology development are essential for a successful construction industry and national economic growth. A strong regulatory framework ensures that only qualified professionals lead construction projects, minimizing risks and maximizing efficiency. Conversely, the absence of proper oversight and the influence of unqualified decision-makers can lead to project failures, economic losses, and compromised infrastructure quality. By prioritizing technical expertise and enforcing regulatory standards, governments can strengthen the construction sector and support long-term national development.
Mekonnen Tsegaw holds a BSc in Civil Engineering, an MSc in Geotechnical (Civil) Engineering, and an LLB in Law, combining technical expertise with legal acumen to address complex challenges in engineering and construction law. Associate Member of Nemad Consulting Architects and Engineers Plc.
Editor’s Note: The views entertained in this article do not necessarily reflect the stance of The Ethiopian Herald
BY MEKONNEN TSEGAW
THE ETHIOPIAN HERALD SUNDAY EDITION 23 MARCH 2025
